Episode 015 - 9th Feb 26

Episode 015 - 9th Feb 26

Episode 015 - 9th Feb 26

B2C Lead Gen: How To Improve Lead Quality and Protect Sales Time

In this episode of Unqualified Leads, we break down why chasing lead volume in B2C often creates more problems than growth.

We dig into how high lead volume quietly destroys sales efficiency, where poor qualification actually happens inside the funnel, and how marketers can take responsibility for protecting sales time rather than overwhelming it.

You’ll learn how to diagnose lead quality issues using real funnel metrics, how to pre qualify leads through creative, forms, and landing pages, and how to design systems that filter intent before leads ever reach sales. We also cover practical tactics like pricing callouts, exclusion based messaging, instant forms, conditional logic, WhatsApp flows, and landing page structure that actually improves close rates.

This episode is for B2C teams who want fewer wasted calls, better conversations, and a funnel that prioritises quality over noise.

design pic
design pic
design pic

Transcript

Unqualified Leads – Episode 015 Highlights

Hosts: Harry Hughes & Dan

Topic: Why lead volume breaks B2C funnels, how unqualified scale wastes sales capacity, and how to design creative, forms, and landing pages to pre-qualify properly, so fewer leads close faster.


The Core Problem: Lead Volume ≠ Revenue

This episode zooms in on B2C lead generation, where the obsession with volume is often most damaging.

The common belief:

More leads = more sales.

The reality:

  • Scaling volume usually reduces quality

  • Sales teams hit capacity fast

  • 50–70% of leads turn out to be:


    • not ready

    • not qualified

    • not a fit


  • Sales time (your most expensive asset) gets burned

The result:

  • Slower deal velocity

  • Lower close rates

  • Frustrated sales teams

  • Higher staff churn

  • More spend to replace inefficiency

The goal is not more leads, but a more efficient funnel.

Step One: Diagnose Where the Funnel Is Breaking

Before changing tactics, you need to identify where qualification is failing.

1. Lead → Qualified Rate

Question:

Of all inquiries, how many become qualified leads?

  • If this rate is low, the issue is pre-qualification

  • Likely causes:


    • creative

    • targeting

    • offer

    • landing page clarity


Rule of thumb:

~50%+ qualified suggests decent filtering

Too high can also be a warning (you may be excluding viable buyers).

2. Qualified → Call Show Rate

Question:

Are people actually turning up?

If:

  • 60–70% no-show rate persists

  • despite reminders, calendar invites, SMS/email nudges

Then the problem isn’t follow-up.

It’s intent mismatch. People inquiring ≠ people ready.

3. Close Rate

Question:

Of “qualified” leads, how many actually buy?

Low close rates indicate:

  • price shock

  • misunderstanding of offer

  • mismatched expectations

  • wrong timing


Key point:

If deals die late, the fix is usually earlier in the funnel, not in sales.

A Key Reframe on MQLs, SQLs, and Measurement

Dan adds an important first-principles lens:

  • Digital marketing forces over-measurement

  • In reality, inquiry ≠ readiness

  • Some leads are:


    • problem-aware

    • solution-aware

    • price-aware

    • not in-market yet

Not every inquiry should be forced into an SQL bucket. Intent exists on a spectrum.

Where to Fix It First: Creative

Creative is the first gate in the funnel. If the wrong people walk through the gate, nothing downstream fixes it.

Price as a Qualification Tool

Example:

  • £20,000/week luxury holiday

  • If price isn’t shown:


    • platforms show ads to £2,000/week buyers

    • budget gets wasted instantly

Platforms like Meta largely learn from creative signals, not intent.

Including price:

  • excludes the wrong audience

  • attracts buyers already comfortable at that level

Price doesn’t scare off the right buyers.

It repels the wrong ones.

Identity-Based Copy

Instead of features, speak to who the buyer is.

Examples:

  • “For entrepreneurs seeking EIS/SEIS relief”

  • “For investors with £500k+ liquid capital”

  • “For teams who’ve already tried X and need Y”

If someone doesn’t recognise themselves in the copy, they self-exclude. That’s the point.

Think in Exclusion, Not Just Inclusion

Harry reframes it:

Instead of asking:

“How do I attract my ICP?”

Also ask:

“How do I deliberately exclude the leads we don’t want?”

Simple phrases can do this:

  • “For serious investors only”

  • “Designed for established operators”

  • “Not suitable for beginners”


Exclusion sharpens quality.

Forms as a Qualification Layer (Not Just a Capture Tool)

Instant Forms (Meta / LinkedIn)

Pros:

  • Low friction

  • Fast conversions

Risk:

  • Poor quality if left unfiltered

Best practices:

  • Always enable 2FA

  • Use multiple steps (not one-click submits)

  • Reinforce key qualifiers from the ad

  • Add conditional logic


Example:

  • Budget bands

  • Timeline to buy

  • Type of requirement


Then:

  • Qualified → sales call

  • Not ready → nurture / alternative product / resources


WhatsApp & SMS Flows

Used like conversational forms:

  • question → answer → branch

  • route based on readiness

  • delay sales contact if intent is low


Especially effective in B2C and geo-specific markets.

Landing Page vs Instant Form: Strategic Choice

Key question:

Does the buyer need to see something before they can qualify?

  • Property → landing page essential

  • Services / consultations → instant forms may outperform


Best approach:

  • Split test landing page vs instant form

  • Compare:


    • qualification rate

    • close rate

    • speed to sale


No dogma, just outcomes.

Landing Pages: Built for Cold Traffic, Not Referrals

A critical warning:

Most sites are built for:

  • referrals

  • warm intros

  • word of mouth

Cold traffic needs:

  • proof

  • clarity

  • credibility


Landing Page Must Answer:

  • “Is this for someone like me?”

  • “Has this worked for others like me?”

  • “Can I trust this?”


That means:

  • testimonials

  • reviews

  • case studies

  • recognisable logos

  • clear FAQs

  • pricing clarity


If buyers have to Google proof themselves, you’ve already lost them.

FAQs as a Sales Efficiency Tool

FAQs should:

  • mirror real sales objections

  • remove reasons to inquire “just to ask”


Every unnecessary inquiry is wasted sales time.

The Feedback Loop That Most Teams Miss

Every non-conversion is data.

You should be tracking:

  • no-show reasons

  • close-lost reasons (with detail, not just categories)


Best practice:

  • one high-level category

  • one detailed free-text explanation


Then:

  • review monthly or quarterly

  • identify patterns

  • update:


    • ads

    • forms

    • landing pages


Qualification improves by iteration, not guesses.

Advanced Layer: Feeding Quality Back to Ad Platforms

Final closing point:

Don’t optimise platforms for:

  • “lead”

  • “inquiry”

Instead:

  • send SQL data

  • send closed-won data

  • optimise toward buyers, not clickers


Platforms learn from outcomes, not intentions.

Key Takeaways

  • Lead volume hides inefficiency

  • Sales time is the constraint, not traffic

  • Diagnose before scaling

  • Creative is the first filter

  • Exclusion is a feature, not a flaw

  • Forms and flows can pre-qualify at scale

  • Landing pages must mirror the buyer

  • First-party sales data is your strongest optimisation lever


Fewer leads. Better buyers. Faster revenue.